“For when my outward action doth demonstrate the native act and figure of my heart in compliment extern, ‘Tis not long after but I will wear my heart upon my sleeve for jackdaws to peck at; I am not what I am.” (Iago’s speech from Othello Act 1 Scene 1).

Pop stars are often accused of “pretension”, but this is a word that is frequently misused. Many of these accusers are too quick to condemn them with this without realising the true meaning of the word which is, “an attempt to impress other people by pretending to be more important or better than you actually are.” So it is untrue that pop stars utilize this, in fact for the majority it is the opposite.

Many pop stars wear their “heart upon their sleeve”. Their obsessions and innermost feelings are displayed unashamedly but this also gives ample opportunity for bitter and twisted critics to feast upon them like jackdaws. Jealousy drives this hatred, as many music critics are also frustrated musicians. It is difficult for them to appreciate talent or unique artistry.

Lana Del Rey recently released her new album. She is unique in the music world so it is difficult for misogynists to appreciate her or even acknowledge her original talent. It confuses them as they are so convinced that a man must be responsible for her act. Del Rey is entirely her own creation, the persona of the songwriter Elizabeth Grant. She wears her heart upon her sleeve invoking the idols of Old Hollywood but entirely without irony. These are idols from a lost and gilded age, a world away from the vanity and shallowness that characterizes the celebrity culture of today. Their glamour had a rare and beautiful quality.

This glamour is exemplified in the photography of Slim Aarons, who Del Rey references on a track on the album. The title of the album is also an effusive tribute to the American illustrator Norman Rockwell. Rockwell was derided by art critics for his overt sentimentality but his work was revered and adored by an entire nation of people who saw their “American Dream” revealed on canvas. The imagery and lyricism within the album is overtly sentimental but in a good way. The battle between cynics and sentimentalists is the defining conflict of our age.

Cynics are characterized as pragmatic and immune to any overt emotion. However sentimentalists are never embarrassed when they reveal their true feelings, and they are often misunderstood by stoical people who are convinced that they are simply lacking in maturity. Yet stoics and cynics seem less than human to emotive people. Using logic as a default position seems cold and callous.

Most of us fall somewhere between these two extremes. However those of us who are further along the emotive spectrum find that it is a risky strategy to reveal our true feelings. It makes us vulnerable. Our vulnerability provides too much temptation for the jackdaws to pounce upon our hearts. At the other end of the spectrum living in a permanent state of invulnerability only serves to alienate people. These are people who far from appearing confident seem rather aloof and even arrogant. As I pointed out in a previous Blog post withholding emotions and feelings restricts artistic expression. Presenting yourself as an intellectual in the most prosaic form will never inspire others. It is obvious from the writing, which is dry and wanting. However Lana Del Rey`s characteristic “sad girl” aesthetic has tremendous meaning and significance for a huge amount of people. And for that very reason her album is a triumph.

Fallen Angels.

Lucifer was the most famous example of a “fallen angel”, a divine being so consumed with pride that he found himself on the dark side. “Lucifer” means “morning star”, and he believed that his stellar quality was greater than the other angels in Heaven. These divine powers became perverted and God cast him out of Heaven and banished him to Hell.

In Hell he became Satan, a literal translation of this means “adversary” but in the popular imagination he is the personification of everything evil in this world and in the hereafter. A new film “Hail Satan?” is about to be released in the cinema but it focusses on the “adversary” nature of this part mythic being rather than the “evil” that many people perceive him to be. Essentially it is a satire on religious hypocrisy within the USA, raising the hackles of the self righteous.

Many critics state that the aims of these “Satanists” are eerily similar to Christs teachings and I am sure that this is deliberate. Jesus wanted to save the sinners rather than condemn them, a point that frequently escapes from the minds of the zealots. Lucifer was the most famous creature to join the dark side but he isn't the only one to do so, and neither will he be the last. There are many mortals living here on Earth who have been tempted over to the “other side”.

These are people who are lured by the promises of fame and money. The temptation is so strong that they are unconcerned about the loss of respect that will ensue. The reward somehow outweighs any loss, of respect, of friendships and reputation. Politics and the media are the two realms renowned for such behavior. They seem to attract the most venal individuals in society. The only decent people working within these realms abide by their sense of morality and responsibility and maintain the respect of their peers, a much greater reward than any material prize.

No-one expects mortal human beings to behave like angels but it is easy to spot the individuals who care more about notoriety and the material wealth that this engenders. They are similarly unconcerned about respect and responsibility. Again politics and the echo chambers that it spawns within the media lure in those who appear emotionally stunted and hardened. They are unmoved by human frailty and vulnerability, it amuses them.

“Spiked Online” are the personification of these modern day Lucifers. It was bizarre to witness one of these creatures on a Sunday morning discussion show. It wasn`t just bizarre, it was perverse for an ostensibly “faith” based programme on the BBC to indulge such an entity. Ella Whelan was invited on as a guest to discuss modern morality (!!), this “Whelan” creation is the same that condemned the complainants of “MeToo”. It is sinister to watch and listen to her. She frequently giggles like a psychopath when she talks about subjects which are obviously not funny. She is a militant abortionist like many at “Spiked”. Her other bugbears are depressingly familiar, the so-called “victimhood culture” and entwined with this free speech without limits, including hurtful and offensive speech on the Internet.

Perhaps for such a being so impervious to personal and/or hateful criticism/trolling my analysis will not affect her. Equally any reasonable person will just see through her and “Spiked” as irrelevant and tedious provocateurs for hire. However my question is how exhausting must this act be? They have already had their reward in this life, but it must be at such a great personal cost. And herein is the central argument to this article and indeed the reason for my entire blog. I nearly sold my soul to these people!!

“Spiked Online” was formed from the remnants of the RCP/LM group, a shameless group of provocateurs from the late 80s/early 90s. I was involved with them but I began to have doubts about them. I found that their ideas were frequently contradictory and/or nonsensical. Most of the time I concluded (correctly) that they were just attention seekers. It didnt bother me until serious things started to happen like their infamous genocide denial. Their attitudes to the events in Bosnia and Rwanda seemed to me distasteful and downright disgusting. I was informed that to progress politically I had to take their line. I couldn`t do it.

The final straw came in July 1994 when I saw the campaign poster for “No more Hiroshimas”. It was idiotic and attention seeking but also very, very wrong and incredibly offensive. It upset me the most because it denigrated the experience of my grandfather and his fellow soldiers from the Burma Campaign. My depression imploded and I had a breakdown. I extricated myself from this group and saved my self respect, but I still see these chancers (dis)grace themselves in the media and I fear one day that they will regret selling their own sense of morality so cheaply.

Through A Glass Darkly…

The complicated life and work of Yukio Mishima has fallen under the spotlight once more. Mishima was born Kimitake Hiraoke in Japan in 1925. His alter ego was so much more than a mordant chronicler of twentieth century Japan. He was a true master of the dark arts within a literary sensibility.

His greatest influence came from the Decadent movement, Oscar Wilde in particular. He was fascinated by the amorality of Dorian Grey. Whereas Grey was an archetype, Mishima humanizes the most monstrous of characters. Mishima really gets under the skin of his characters. A less capable writer would represent villainy through cliché however he had a rare gift as he could empathise with the monster.

Mishima was a transgressive writer. In his work the world is just a façade, beneath this there is no beauty, no moral purpose and existence has little meaning besides being nasty, brutish and short. His characters are driven by lust and avarice and their souls are pitifully hollow.

There is a parallel which can be drawn between Mishimas fictional kingdom of monsters and the post Atom bomb fable of Godzilla. Within that tale the sea monster Godzilla emerges from deep beneath his lair to save the remaining humanity in his wake. Mishima`s characters redeem themselves in an unorthodox way. They are the mirror of a strict and militaristic society that has no room for feelings. This is where the reader arrives to invest hope and humanity into these nihilistic beings.

Mishima died in a ritual suicide in 1970. However now that we have access to his greatest works of fiction we can see how he wanted to transcend beyond the society and culture that he lived in. He is a literary legend who dared to delve into a world rarely traversed by other writers.

Bad Blood.

There is a universal truth about life which is often forgotten, in that when we are first brought into the world we are innocent. Guilt is actually something imposed upon us by adults, but as children it is impossible for us to understand such things. Even our conception is a process which occurs out of our control. Our supposed “birthright” is therefore completely out of our hands, whether we are born from the union of two paupers or two monarchs.

As soon as we are able to make decisions we can either honour our privilege or reject it. We can strive hard to overcome our disadvantage or merely succumb to our fate. All human beings struggle with this, some regret their life choices but there are others who are thankful for making them. In the fable “The Little Prince” the eponymous hero descends upon our planet with wide eyed fascination. His naivety and unworldliness are heroic as he bears no malice, prejudice or even any ulterior motive. He is simply curious.

The author of this fable was Antoine de Saint-Exupery, the same writer of “The Wind, Sand and the Stars”. He was born into privilege but he later became an author and war hero as a pilot during the Second World War. His greatest literary achievements were inspired by his adventures. His missions were mainly undertaken at night, a time when people feel a peculiar sense, a kind of “dark night of the soul”. He also felt this, alone, afraid, in darkness and travelling above a distant world, he nonetheless created his greatest ideas whilst flying.

The Nazis preached their abhorrent philosophies while Saint-Exupery figuratively and even literally shot them down. The worst theory invented by the Nazis was blood purity. Scientifically speaking this is nonsense as blood has the same level of purity in all human beings. However ethically and morally these policies lead to the darkest period of our human civilization. The Nazis believed that they were the “master race” and also the sole custodians of art and culture. They believed that they were superior and they initiated a regime of death and destruction against so-called “degenerates”.

Thankfully the Nazis did not win, and many lives were saved through Allied efforts. In spite of the privations and indignities of war, hope and courage did not die, but most importantly the notion that our “blood” controls our destiny was banished.

The Basaglia Experiment.

Last month the denizens of Dublin celebrated “Bloomsday” an annual celebration of their once exiled son James Joyce and his misunderstood classic novel “Ulysses”. As the years have passed Irish people have rehabilitated the man and his literary reputation. When once he was a figure of disgrace, now he is part of the history of Dublin. No-one can forget his paean to the city and its people in his short story collection entitled “Dubliners”.

However as a young man he was ambitious and utterly convinced of his own genius, and it seemed that his ego was too large to be accommodated in Ireland. At 22 he moved to the Continent in an attempt to begin a new life as an aesthete, free from the shackles of convention and polite Irish society. This was a society dominated by the influence of the Catholic church and its dogma, which in Joyce`s eyes prevented the development of free thinking, both intellectually and artistically.

Joyce worked as a language teacher in Trieste. He found himself at home here because it was a modern cosmopolitan city and a beacon for artists and writers. He was accompanied by his great love, Nora Barnacle and their two children Giorgo and Lucia. Lucia was a sickly child and unused to the many upheavals and changes in fortune owing to her father`s literary career.

Lucias adolescence was marked by insecurity and mental instability. Some people, including her own father believe that this was inherited. However this is a moot point. Joyces literary work is characterized by grandeur and sometimes linguistic impenetrability but he could not be classified as mentally ill. Lucia in contrast began her life in a pauper`s hospital and struggled with her health in early infancy. She was also born with an eye condition which made her appear cross eyed . She had a famous dalliance with Samuel Beckett but it abruptly came to an end. She also had a fervent hope that she could become a professional dancer but failed in her endeavor. Then she developed schizophrenia and spent most of her life in psychiatric institutions. She died in a Northampton asylum in 1982.

Ironically it was a pioneering psychiatrist from Trieste who sought to change mental health care and the perception of psychiatric patients. Dr. Franco Basaglia devised a more humane system of treatment focusing upon the individual patient. He found the regime of restraint and confinement distasteful and counterproductive to the patient`s recovery.

His ideas became part of a more modern approach to treat psychiatric patients but it took time for these to become accepted by his peers. However these radical approaches began to filter through and spread beyond the medical establishment in Trieste. These new ideas even influenced health policy here in the UK. Enoch Powell was an unlikely advocate when he was health minister in 1960. His “Hospital Plan” to modernize the Psychiatric Hospitals did not come to fruition, however.

Twenty years later Powell`s plans (inspired by Dr.Basaglia)came back into favour. “Care in the Community” became official policy in 1983, too late for vulnerable people like Lucia Joyce, but a sign that mental health issues should not be hidden away or become a source of shame for patients and their families. For decades family members were banished to asylums and rapidly became institutionalized. The effects of this were horrific, gradually the person they loved would disappear in a recognized side effect of institutionalization known as “depersonalization”.

The new policy modernized the psychiatric hospital. Patients were allowed to wear their own clothes,often had a room to themselves and would only stay as in patients during the acute stages of their illness. Then they would be encouraged to adapt to the outside world through therapy provided by out patient services. Staff at these units also would wear their own clothes rather than uniforms. Gradually patients could recover this way before returning to the community rehabilitated. Thankfully the Basaglia project has made mental health services more humane and allowed us to turn away from the bad old days of the institution which ultimately failed luminaries like Lucia Joyce and her fellow travelers.

Legend.

When a popular musician dies, it is his art that endures. People will remember the music rather than the man. All of the pettiness that dogged his career while he was still alive will seem so shallow compared to the profundity emanating and resonating from the work.

In the Millennial age there are devilish instruments designed to destroy rather than help to create. It is easy to create a platform to denigrate, and it is very lucrative. However it is much harder in this climate to earn respect, as it requires a certain level of courage to be truly individual in the face of so much hostility.

The platforms which denigrate trade on many things, one is brevity. Everything is reduced to something. Music, however aims to open, to flower to inspire other people to acquire greater things. It is part of our politics, of our society, but it also transcends all of those things.

This blog post was inspired by the criticisms meted out to those attending Glastonbury, and in particular those who watched the Stormzy set. Again the critics fundamentally misunderstood the role that music plays in all of our lives, it is meant to be enjoyed by everyone regardless of race or culture.

The critics also focus upon the political aspects of Stormzys work. This is immaterial, as it is the quality of the music which counts. Oscar Wilde said that art cannot be judged by its moral standards, it is either good or bad. Stormzys lyrics might appear crude, lewd, violent and perhaps a little naïve but that does not matter because it is an artistic representation of his life experience. He isn`t a politician, he is a sincere artist and that deserves our respect.

When Goya was commissioned as a court painter he fulfilled his role dutifully with his expert portraiture. However later on in his life he experienced a severe illness and he became profoundly deaf. His trauma is etched into a series called the “Black paintings”. Unfortunately it is the unsettling and disturbing art of his latter career which most of us remember rather than his official work demanded by his patron.

We remember this art because it is a sincere depiction of his disability. The Stormzy critics focused upon his attire at Glastonbury, in particular the “stab vest” and drew all sorts of conclusions. However it was obvious to me that it was this was a unique and sincere way of expressing himself. He was brave to take to the stage and present his work to an audience of people who would not necessarily experience the same things in life that he has. Hopefully minds and hearts were opened that night and he fulfilled his role as a Glastonbury legend.

The Slow March to….Nothing in Particular.

I was a belligerent adolescent. I used to fantasise about running away from school. I imagined meeting fellow runaways, but they were much better at it. Unlike me they were fleet of foot whereas I struggled to get out of the starting blocks whenever we had track practice at school. They were witty and clever and had dazzling, mercurial ways of expression. I was virtually mute at school and more like a doormat when it came to levels of self-esteem.

I had hoped that I would get better teachers at secondary school. I was wrong. All teenagers believe that they are outsiders for one reason or another. However I believed that I was being unfairly persecuted by the school. I couldn`t wait to leave such an oppressive institution and be myself.

I left school in the summer of 1991. I managed to acquire 5 GCSEs, the minimum required for Sixth Form College. That following September I was consumed with a very bourgeois kind of ennui. I was looking for a new cause. Rave had become the bete noire of the tabloids. Young people, some of them just a year or two older than I had flocked to raves. These were almost like mobile discos run by a new breed of travelling minstrel, the “New Age Travellers”.

These travelers were much braver than I was at the time, they put their rebellion into action. They left their homes, dropped out of conventional society and criss-crossed the country in second hand trucks. Some were convinced that they were on a noble quest to reconnect themselves to our ancient ley lines but most were committed to just having a good time in a field.

It wasnt just the tabloids, the travelers and their lifestyles met the opprobrium of politicians. The rave music they used to party to was characterized as a "series of repetitive beats". Reducing an entire culture like this was a perfect example of the establishments prejudice. I lacked the courage and defiance of the travelers but I was inspired by their example of individualist spirit.

Echo and Narcissus Redux.

Social media can be congratulated for many things but it has been criticized as a toxic influence on the young. The most damaging accusation is that it encourages narcissism. Narcissists have always existed but social media sites have been blamed for enabling them.

There is certainly more visibility associated with this phenomenon. Young people are more visually orientated than previous generations due to the ubiquity of smartphones. Previous generations relied on magazines, the radio and the four terrestrial television channels. While young people today are being accused of being fragile and frankly rather vain, previous generations were derided as being rather over earnest with politics and self absorbed.

Plus ca change indeed! Young people have always been blamed by the ones who have gone before just as that song goes. We tend to forget our own foibles as young people. When we remember those things we wince at the memory but grateful that we survived relatively intact. This story of growing up is as old as time itself and we must bear this in mind next time we glance at yet another “snowflake” story.

Giants of the Sea.

In Maori folklore the archipelago that defines New Zealand was formed from a giant fish reeled in from a mischievous creature called Maui. The fish became North island, the South island was formed from his canoe and Stewart Island was borne out of the canoe`s anchor. Spiritually Maoris believe that they are created from the physical phenomena of the lands. The people and the land are indivisible from each other.

Everyone remembers the cinematic triumph of “Whale Rider” a film made from a visionary novel of the same name. It brought Maori culture to the rest of the world and revealed how an ancient and proud people struggle with so called modern western values. It was also an incredible allegory which is still pertinent today, 30 years after the original book was written.

Jacinda Ardern is now at the helm, guiding a new generation into a new and frightening world. She has achieved something unthinkable. She has acquired the respect of all of the people and was given a Maori honour. Her aim to boost the well-being of the nation has only just begun and she will have to follow the footsteps of the ancient people, those giants of the land, the sea and the stars.

The Instruments of Change.

The New Zealand Premier, Jacinda Ardern has made her first steps towards fulfilling her childhood promise to help the poor Maori slum children. When she was a child she was horrified that these children were barefoot, hungry and dressed in rags. Ardern felt that on a purely human level this was unfair. In her mind everyone deserved a life of dignity and respect.

New Zealand`s indigenous people, the Maoris have a rich heritage and culture. When the Europeans arrived they were driven by the false logic of the age and sought to usurp this culture. Maoris by virtue of their birthright have a deep and enduring connection to their country. This magnificent country provides the template for Middle Earth in the Lord of the Rings films but for an entire community it is a place of sublime beauty. The Maoris have an elemental connection to this as it is their ancestral land.

Ardern has just announced that history will become a compulsory subject in New Zealand schools. This is just one bold initiative in her quest to boost the emotional well being of her nation. It is clear that recognising Maoris and their proud identity is a vital step on the path towards achieving a healthy state of mind. Creativity can also play a role in this process. The novelist, poet and artist, Keri Hulme comes from a mixed heritage and she has drawn from this to create her work. Her unique Maori and Celtic identity illuminates her Booker Prize winning novel, “The Bone People”.

“The Bone People” is part fever dream, part hymn, part testimony to the people Hulme remembered while labouring on a tobacco farm. At its heart it is a story of love and redemption, it honours the native people on the land. It is a literal embodiment of the people in prose. This is evident in the opening chapter,

“They were nothing more than people by themselves. Even paired, any pairing they would have been nothing more than themselves. But all together, they have become the heart and muscles and mind of something perilous and new, something strange and growing and great.

“Together, all together, they are the instruments of change.”

It is easy to dismiss our basic natures amidst this modern political discourse and rhetoric. However all of us remain a part in the story of humanity. The ragged street children deserve something greater than pity, they should be an instrumental piece in a movement of change. All of humanity, with our hearts, muscles and minds are here together to change our world.